Recall Mayor Jean Quan Petition Drive

Madam City Clerk LaTonda Simmons
City Hall One Frank Ogawa Plaza Oakland,
California 94612

May 11, 2012

Ms. Simmons: As the authorized individual for the proponents for the Committee to Recall Mayor Jean Quan, I am officially informing you that the Committee was unable to collect the requisite number of signatures required to prepare a ballot measure for the November 2012 election calling for her removal.

May 14, 2012 is the designated date for the submission of 19,800 signatures.? This number will not be achieved.

Respectfully submitted,
Gene Hazzard
Proponent for the Committee to Recall Mayor Jean Quan

The Committee To Recall Mayor Jean Quan THANK YOU

Dear Circulators and Supporters:

May 11, 2012

As the proponent for The Committee to Recall Mayor Jean Quan, I would like to THANK all circulators and supporters for your effort in the signature petition drive to prepare a ballot measure calling for the removal of Mayor Jean Quan from office.

Although, we were unable to achieve our goal our mission did not go unnoticed.

It was unfortunate however, that there were multiple petitions[and in my mind ]was purposely intended to create a climate of confusion for the voter ; one petition which was unauthorized, because the individual leading the circulation effort never received a authorizing letter from the office of the city clerk(which was required), and whom subsequently suspended their circulation effort for which the media gave a lot of coverage Many voters thought all petition drive efforts had ceased.

The other petition was able to be advanced because the office of the city attorney made a determination based upon a California Supreme Court decision in 1933[Morrow v. Board of Directors of Imperial Irr.m Dist], the Supreme Court reversed a lower Court decision; the lower Court had denied the circulation of a second petition because of the theft / lost of 647 initial signatures which were never found.

So there was a legal cloud in this instant matter cited above which was not the case for The Committee To Recall Mayor Jean Quan Petition(there was no legal cloud) thus,the city attorney should never have allowed the proponents of this competing petition to be circulated, once again creating a climate of confusion for the voter, where no petition would be able to be successful.

Mayor Quan will continue to show her ineptness and our city will continue to plummet into a fiscal abyss under her leadership. Is this what Stand With Oakland means?

Respectfully,

Gene Hazzard
The Committee to Recall Mayor Jean Quan

REBUTTAL TO QUAN’S ANSWER FOR RECALL

On Public Safety:

Quan: “Secured a federal grant for 25 more officers”

Rebuttal: Mayor Quan would have the residents of Oakland believe that she was responsible for securing the federal grant for 25 more officers. The fact is that former Police Chief Anthony Batts was responsible for securing the federal grant during Mayor Dellums’ administration, due to Chief Batts’ close relationship with Attorney General Eric Holder.

Mayor Quan wants to take the credit for work that Chief Batts had done. Now, Chief Batts is no longer with us.

Quan: “Held 8 town hall meetings with 3,000 residents and a Neighborhood Safety Summit with over 1,000 participants.”

Rebuttal: Crime continues to soar! While Mayor Quan speaks at town hall meetings and safety summits, we need to ask ‘Where are the results?’. Crime is at a record high from the previous administration.

Port of Oakland:

Quan: “Led China trade missions, regional and international meetings to promote the Port.

Rebuttal: While Quan may have participated in the trade missions to China, the Executive Director and other Port staff have been negotiating with China for years. Former City Councilmember Henry Chang, along with Port Staff have been responsible for laying the groundwork for the current relationship with China.

Quan: “Secured City, Port, Developer agreement on $400 million development to bring millions in Federal and State grants and create 3000 jobs”.

Rebuttal: Quan has totally misrepresented the current negotions with the Port. In a letter from Mark Erickson, Senior Maritime Projects Administrator, dated October 7, 2011 a different story emerges. A few excerpts: “Our respective negotiating teams have worked hard and in good faith to reach agreement on a future development deal for the Oakland Army Base (OAB), but thus far, we have not been able to resolve enough issues for the Port to feel confident in moving forward. As you know (largely at your insistence), the Predevelopment Agreement established July 31, 2011 as a due for reaching agreement on (i)a Master Development Plan, (ii) a detailed financing plan that includes a schedule for obtaining firm commitments for each source of funds identified in the financing plan, and (iii) a term sheet for preparing the final Transaction Documents. While we have made a fair amount of progress in some of these areas, we still have not determined with any real degree of certainty how the approximately $200 million financing gap for the public infrastructure will be filled, and we have not yet reached agreement on the term sheet sufficiently detailed as to allow for the preparation of the final transaction document.”

“Everybody, including the Port, is even more risk averse than ever before, and there still appears to be too many uncertainties in this transaction for either of us to reach agreement on some very import issues”. “…we have yet to begin any substantive negotiations on many of the other issues presented in that detailed term sheet”.

“Board of Port Commissioners will be considering whether to continue with the Predeveloment Agreement…”

“The Port’s mission remains to manage the seaport consistent with its duties and powere under the City Charter and as a trustee of the state tidelands”.

“We continue to believe that economic development, job growth, and expanded trade facilities accomplished on the port’s (OAB) property, but we do not believe negotiating a long-term land development lease at this time is in our best interests.”

Note: emphasis is our own and did not appear in the original letter to Mark Hansen, Senior Vice President, Investment Officer Prologis, Dan Letter, Vice President, Prologis, and Phillip H, Tagami, Managing General Partner of California Capital & Investment Group.

Also worth noting: Similiar issues of financial uncertainity were evident regarding the Fox Oakland Theater which began as a$33 million endeavor and ended up costing close to $100 million . The recent Performance Audit of the Fox by Oakland City Auditor, Courtney Ruby gives some startling revelations regarding the financing.

RECALL JEAN QUAN KICK-OFF MEETING

TO ALL WHO WISH TO PARTICIPATE EITHER AS CONVENIERS OR CO-CONVENIERS(CONTACT PERSONS) IN THE
RECALL JEAN QUAN KICK-OFF MEETING IS:

THURSDAY DECEMBER 15, 2011

TIME: 6:30p.m. to 8:00p.m.
LOCATION: 1241 HIGH ST.(Near High and International)

contact Gene(510) 418-0501 genehazzard@gmail.com